Wind turbines used to absorb a power surplus?...

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 21:03:46 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On 08/04/2023 16:54, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 05:02:14 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 03:03:33 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:13:21 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

We need bigger wires between countries, it\'s always windy somewhere.

https://sites.suffolk.edu/xenia/2016/02/17/nikola-tesla-and-his-work-in-wireless-energy-and-power-transfer/

Should be possible, just pick a wavelength humans don\'t absorb, then make the equivalent of a microwave link like they do for communications, but fucking powerful.

Since wind and solar power are free, a few per cent transmission
efficiency should be fine.

ROFLMAO!

Coal and oil and gas are free too.
The cost is in extracting them and turning them into electricity.

There is no cost once the wind turbine is up. But the coal power station keeps on eating coal.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 02:50:35 +0100, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:

On 31-Mar-23 12:39 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:39:21 -0000, <upsidedown@downunder.com> wrote:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:39:03 -0000, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

An electrician (who I don\'t believe) told me if there\'s too much
power on the grid, they use wind turbines as fans to absorb extra
power. Is this really true? Aren\'t there plenty of power stations
they can just turn down a bit? Take your foot off the gas so to speak?

If there is a risk of overproduction due to wind turbines, simply stop
some wind turbines. Wind turbines must have brakes so that they can be
stopped during a strong storm (about 25 m/s) to avoid damaging the
turbine. Of course greenies will complain about stopping renewable
production, but who cares .

Why can\'t they make the generator exert more torque so it slows to an
acceptable RPM?


Other things being equal, if the torque goes up, so does the power output.

If you want to increase the torque to limit rotor speed, but at the same
time there\'s problem with wind power overproduction, then you\'re caught
between a rock and a hard place.

No you\'re not. The generator simply needs to be powerful enough to handle the highest winds.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:39:58 +0100, Joe <joe@jretrading.com> wrote:

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:48:17 +0100
\"Commander Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:56:36 -0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

On 25/03/2023 19:28, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:18:28 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:


No, its physics.

It does not take energy to maintain stored heat

That\'s why we insulate houses.

Perhaps you want to review physics, particularly the
thermodynamics part.

No, I don\'t need to do that. You do.

The earth is still

No, it rotates. Or maybe the whole universe rotates?

with a molten core. That\'s because it has a large
volume to surface ratio and some fairly good insulation, and
nothing is keeping it warm apart from a smidgeon of decay heat

Isn\'t there something to do with rotation and magnets and the core
which makes more heat?

Maybe that\'s why we\'re slowing down.

I understood this was due to tidal friction, which happens even without
loose water. It is unlikely that the Moon, however it was acquired,
arrived with no rotation relative to the Earth.

Has anyone considered whether the energy being absorbed from the wind
by millions of turbines around the world is affecting the global
climate? Now that would be a good laugh.

Indeed, slwoing down the wind has gotta make a direct impact. Those greenies are so thick.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 14:47:21 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:36:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:10:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:18:45 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:56:27 -0000, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

On 2023-03-20, alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 00:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:

Domestic cats kill 2.4 billion birds annually. Windmills account for
1 in 4000 of the annual total, maybe half a million max.

To make that a fair comparison you have to use the figures for kills per
cat and kills per windmill.

Many fewer

Posh twatt. Use less.

wind turbines are needed per household than cats.

Cats are not needed at all.

Wives aren\'t either.

That is true. But doing without a wife is like doing without a TV.

TV is trash. I don\'t watch TV. I like to watch my wife.

Who is she fucking while you\'re watching her?

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 14:47:21 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:36:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:10:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:18:45 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:56:27 -0000, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

On 2023-03-20, alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 00:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:

Domestic cats kill 2.4 billion birds annually. Windmills account for
1 in 4000 of the annual total, maybe half a million max.

To make that a fair comparison you have to use the figures for kills per
cat and kills per windmill.

Many fewer

Posh twatt. Use less.

wind turbines are needed per household than cats.

Cats are not needed at all.

Wives aren\'t either.

That is true. But doing without a wife is like doing without a TV.

TV is trash. I don\'t watch TV. I like to watch my wife.

Who is she fucking while you\'re watching her?

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 7:10:06 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:39:58 +0100, Joe <j...@jretrading.com> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:48:17 +0100
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 20:56:36 -0000, The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 25/03/2023 19:28, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:18:28 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

<snip>

Has anyone considered whether the energy being absorbed from the wind by millions of turbines around the world is affecting the global
climate? Now that would be a good laugh.

Wind energy gets turned into heat by friction - the wind passing over any surface experiences drag, and that is just the kinetic energy of moving air being converted to heat.

Wind turbines just move the point where the wind energy is converted to heat to a different point - and if the power generated is stored, a later time..

> Indeed, slowing down the wind has gotta make a direct impact.

But it\'s unlikely to be a perceptible one.

> Those greenies are so thick.

Not remotely as thick as Commander Kinsey.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Max Demian]

On 23/04/2023 05:26, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 17:38:46 +0100, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 16:37:44 +0100, Andrew <Andrew97d@btinternet.com
wrote:

America has an obesity \'problem\'. All that trudging means lots
of exercise for the meter readers

I think it\'s partly genetic. Some people didn\'t evolve with ice cream
and cheesecake and giant cheezy pizzas. Africans and Pacific Islanders
tend to blimp out on a junk-food diet.

Some people remain skinny and have hot visible abs even though they
don\'t watch what they eat.  It\'s evolution.  If being obese kills you
off, there will be no more obese people.

But what makes no sense at all is ugly people should never get the
chance to reproduce.  They should have all died out.  Who the hell is
fucking fat ugly folk?

That\'s what beer is for.

--
Max Demian

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 7:05:24 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 02:50:35 +0100, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:

On 31-Mar-23 12:39 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:39:21 -0000, <upsid...@downunder.com> wrote:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:39:03 -0000, \"Commander Kinsey\"
C...@nospam.com> wrote:

An electrician (who I don\'t believe) told me if there\'s too much
power on the grid, they use wind turbines as fans to absorb extra
power. Is this really true? Aren\'t there plenty of power stations
they can just turn down a bit? Take your foot off the gas so to speak?

If there is a risk of overproduction due to wind turbines, simply stop
some wind turbines. Wind turbines must have brakes so that they can be
stopped during a strong storm (about 25 m/s) to avoid damaging the
turbine. Of course greenies will complain about stopping renewable
production, but who cares .

Why can\'t they make the generator exert more torque so it slows to an
acceptable RPM?


Other things being equal, if the torque goes up, so does the power output.

If you want to increase the torque to limit rotor speed, but at the same
time there\'s problem with wind power overproduction, then you\'re caught
between a rock and a hard place.

No you\'re not. The generator simply needs to be powerful enough to handle the highest winds.

Commander Kinsey has never heard of variable pitch propellors. With a wind turbine you can always reduce the pitch of the blades so they don\'t rotates too fast (and don\'t generate too much power) no matter how fast the wind if blowing. It the wind were fast enough it could rip fully feathered blades off their rotor, but the current generation of wind turbines seems to have been designed with enough safety margin that this hasn\'t happened yet.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 3:56:13 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 20:43:26 +0100, Andrew <Andr...@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 08/04/2023 19:16, alan_m wrote:
On 08/04/2023 18:59, Andrew wrote:

<snip>

Dream on. *everyone* is going to be paying double what they were
previously for a daily standing charge, ad infinitum.

All because our governments are looking after the fucking Ukraine.

Actually, they are enjoying the chance to fight a war against Putin on somebody else\'s territory.

Allow Putin to grab the Ukraine, and he\'ll move on to grab something closer.. Help the Ukranians to demonstrate that he\'s an incompetent thug, and you\'ll get him replaced by somebody who might have a better grasp of reality. Commander Kinsey might think that he was such a candidate, and I\'d encourage him to emmigrate to Russia and offer his services. Buying a one-way ticket would assure them that he was serious.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 23, 2023 at 5:30:41 AM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:35:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid..invalid> wrote:
On 30/03/2023 18:36, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:05:50 GMT, sc...@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:
John Larkin <jla...@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> writes:
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:54:34 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam..com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:19:59 -0000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 21-Mar-23 7:42 am, upsid...@downunder.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 18:34:51 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <t....@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 18/03/2023 11:39, upsid...@downunder.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 09:39:03 -0000, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:

<snip>

> > That\'s virtually guaranteed with \'green\' energy none of which is radical or new, all of which has been tried at least on paper and none of which has been found to be viable.

John Larkin\'s grasp of what viable is influenced by the climate change denial propaganda which he swallows like the gullible idiot he is.

Australia\'s utility companies won\'t invest in any other kind of new generator that isn\'t solar cells or wind turbines. They are investing in the grid-scale storage that lets them get away with intermittent sources. There\'s enough fast start gas turbine generation on the grid to fill in the gaps until the grid scale batteres and pumped hydroelecric storage come on line, but around here green energy is the only viable generation option.

> Bullshit. Renewable energy is a good idea because - there\'s no fuel cost, and the fuel can\'t run out. It\'s not a good idea because of CO2. We should use whatever turns out cheapest. That will eventually be renewable as gas runs out.

Commander Kinsey is much too dim to realise that injecting even more CO2 into the atmosphere isn\'t a good idea. He\'s even more stupid than John Larkin, so he doesn\'t need climate change denial propaganda to give him the wrong idea - he just can\'t understand the physics involved.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 06:50:51 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 20:25:35 +0100, <upsidedown@downunder.com> wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 03:15:40 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 11:40:42 +0100, <upsidedown@downunder.com> wrote:

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:39:43 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:39:21 -0000, <upsidedown@downunder.com> wrote:


What to do with excess energy production during wind overproduction

In areas with mainly cooling loads, wind and solar overproduction can
be used to cool water in advance for air conditioning.

Water powered air conditioning?! Water isn\'t cold enough.

Air conditioning requires a lot of energy for moving heat from indoor
20 C to outdoor 30 C.

However, if the indoor heat is dumped into 0 to +20 C water, very
little energy is needed.

The specific heat for water is 4 kJ/kg/K, thus 80 kJ/kg can be dumped
when the water is warmed from 0 to +20 C.

If excess wind production is used to make ice, 330 kJ(kg can be dumped
while going from 0 C ice to 0 C water. If the water is then allowed to
warm to +20 C, a total of 410 kJ can be dumped. Assume a 1000 liter
ice(water tank that is 410 MJ that is over 100 kWh.

Using only water, 0 C to +20 C is still about 20 kWh.

The water sounds good, but the transport of ice could be a problem.

What is the problem with ice ? People make ice cubes for their whisky
in the fridge.

For an automated system two tanks are required, one smaller for ice
and a slightly larger for ice. On top of the ice tank install a
compressor which during cheap electricity makes ice cubes or thin ice
sheets, dropping into the ice tank.A small low power pump takes the
molten water from the bottom of the ice tank and pumps it to the water
tank to be processed the next night.

If no ice is used and the water temperature is kept above +4 C, a
single water tank should be sufficient, since the water can be kept in
layers.

I meant getting the ice to where you use it. I thought your idea was to use ice too cool homes?

You make the ice at home during cheap night time electricity. During
hot and expensive day, blow warm outside air through the ice into your
home.

You may also integrate existing air conditioning units with the ice
tank, thus reduce the temperature difference the AC has to work
against and hence save expensive daytime electricity.

 

[The Natural Philosopher]

On 23/04/2023 12:54, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:

You make the ice at home during cheap night time electricity. During
hot and expensive day, blow warm outside air through the ice into your
home.

You may also integrate existing air conditioning units with the ice
tank, thus reduce the temperature difference the AC has to work
against and hence save expensive daytime electricity.

Here I have a much better solution. At night I open the windows and the
concrete and masonry loses its heat and becomes a cool bank. By day I
close the curtains and the windows and sit inside my cool masonry.

No electricity is involved at all

--
Of what good are dead warriors? … Warriors are those who desire battle
more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump
their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the
battle dance and dream of glory … The good of dead warriors, Mother, is
that they are dead.
Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners.

 

[Paul]

On 4/23/2023 1:53 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sat, 08 Apr 2023 20:26:26 +0100, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

On 4/7/2023 11:59 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 01 Apr 2023 02:54:30 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On 1 Apr 2023 00:12:29 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:43:00 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:


The cap is 50p, I\'ve replaced many of them.


picofarads or pence?

50 pF electrolytic?

Due to lack of quoting, I\'m not sure what this is about.  But the ones I can think of I mentioned recently were bulk caps in  computer power supplies.  Maybe for a ZX spectrum 50pF might work.

Why do people seperate the number from the units?  You wrote 50 pF, I wrote 50pF.

Let\'s look at some electrolytics in a recent supply. I don\'t see a \"p\" there.
I\'m seeing another letter. And that letter would be relatively
common for this usage (the letter covers a range of mains PSU designs).

https://images.anandtech.com/doci/18773/XPG_FUSION_TITANIUM_1600_15.jpg

Indeed, the p is a hundredth of a pound.  No not a lb (or # in Merkin), the thing which is worth more than a dollar.

That\'s a fancy power supply.  It\'s got daughterboards!  What\'s so special about it?

It\'s got gallium nitride power devices (for efficiency).
Apparently one of the assemblies is \"planar magnetics\",
which is uncommon in ATX supplies. Even though it uses toroids
for the front end filter.

On modern supplies with double forward conversion, one
of the daughterboards is a 12VDC to 3.3V/5V converter board.
Older supplies used one \"supply\" for all outputs. Modern
supplies are two stage. The daughterboard is the second stage,
for the lower current rails.

You would need to read the review, to find out what
the other daughterboards are for. Visual inspection
does not suggest a function.

Paul

 

[Peeler]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 08:50:06 -0400, Paul, another mentally challenged,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, babbled:


> It\'s got gallium nitride power devices (for efficiency).

You got SHIT FOR BRAINS, troll-feeding senile shithead!

 

[Peeler]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 14:54:28 +0300, upsidedown@downunder.com, another
mentally challenged troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE, blathered:

You make the ice at home during cheap night time electricity. During
hot and expensive day, blow warm outside air through the ice into your
home.

You may also integrate existing air conditioning units with the ice
tank, thus reduce the temperature difference the AC has to work
against and hence save expensive daytime electricity.

FFS! Are there ONLY uttlery demented senile SHITHEADS in these three
newsgroups? LMAO

 

[Peeler]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 11:55:10 +0100, Max Dumbian, the REAL dumb, notorious,
troll-feeding senile idiot, blathered again:


> That\'s what beer is for.

What is all your sick senile shit for, you absolutely idiotic senile
trolling cretin?

--
Max Dumb having another senile moment:
\"It\'s the consistency of the shit that counts. Sometimes I don\'t need to
wipe, but I have to do so to tell. Also humans have buttocks to get
smeared due to our bipedalism.\"
MID: <6vydnWiYDoV1VUrDnZ2dnUU78QednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>

--
And yet another senile moment:
\"A fawn bowl will show piss a lot less than a white one.\"
MID: <tv1of3$1v4qg$1@dont-email.me>

 

[John Larkin]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 10:10:01 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 14:47:21 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:36:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:10:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:18:45 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:56:27 -0000, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

On 2023-03-20, alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 00:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:

Domestic cats kill 2.4 billion birds annually. Windmills account for
1 in 4000 of the annual total, maybe half a million max.

To make that a fair comparison you have to use the figures for kills per
cat and kills per windmill.

Many fewer

Posh twatt. Use less.

wind turbines are needed per household than cats.

Cats are not needed at all.

Wives aren\'t either.

That is true. But doing without a wife is like doing without a TV.

TV is trash. I don\'t watch TV. I like to watch my wife.

Who is she fucking while you\'re watching her?

Me.

What a disgusting person you are. I sentence you to being trapped
inside your repulsive poo-packed mind for the rest of your life. Just
now I can\'t imagine a worse punishment.

I bet you can\'t design electronics. You don\'t have the required
personality.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, April 24, 2023 at 12:35:04 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 10:10:01 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 14:47:21 +0100, John Larkin <jla...@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:36:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:10:39 +0100, John Larkin <jla...@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:18:45 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam..com> wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:56:27 -0000, Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2023-03-20, alan_m <ju...@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 00:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:

<snip>

> I bet you can\'t design electronics. You don\'t have the required personality.

Neither does John Larkin - not that the people that I\'ve known who could design electronics had much in common when it came to personality.

The people who were convinced that they could design electronics - even though they weren\'t much good at it - did share John Larkin\'s capacity for self deception.

Commander Kinsey does seem to have that, though he hasn\'t expressed any particular delusions about having that particular skill.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Peeler]

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 07:34:53 -0700, John Larkin, another obviously brain
dead, troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered:

Me.

What a disgusting person you are. I sentence you to being trapped
inside your repulsive poo-packed mind for the rest of your life. Just
now I can\'t imagine a worse punishment.

I bet you can\'t design electronics. You don\'t have the required
personality.

What a useless disgusting troll-feeding SENILE ASSHOLE you are!

 

[Bob F]

On 4/23/2023 7:34 AM, John Larkin wrote:

On Sun, 23 Apr 2023 10:10:01 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 14:47:21 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 09 Apr 2023 05:36:35 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 15:10:39 +0100, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:18:45 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:56:27 -0000, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

On 2023-03-20, alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On 20/03/2023 00:27, Scott Lurndal wrote:

Domestic cats kill 2.4 billion birds annually. Windmills account for
1 in 4000 of the annual total, maybe half a million max.

To make that a fair comparison you have to use the figures for kills per
cat and kills per windmill.

Many fewer

Posh twatt. Use less.

wind turbines are needed per household than cats.

Cats are not needed at all.

Wives aren\'t either.

That is true. But doing without a wife is like doing without a TV.

TV is trash. I don\'t watch TV. I like to watch my wife.

Who is she fucking while you\'re watching her?

Me.

What a disgusting person you are. I sentence you to being trapped
inside your repulsive poo-packed mind for the rest of your life. Just
now I can\'t imagine a worse punishment.

I bet you can\'t design electronics. You don\'t have the required
personality.

It is a troll that you will never get a reasonable response from. Plonk
it, and save us the broadcasting of it\'s tripe.